Town of Newbury

The committee focused on the recommendation and selection of an engineering firm to assess the sewer system. Key discussions included the maintenance and refurbishment needs of the Rapid Infiltration Basin System, the criteria for selecting an engineering firm, and the need for further inquiry into the chosen firm's specific experience with existing infrastructure. Additionally, the committee addressed policies regarding multiple sewer connections, communications to users, and the necessity for professional conduct among committee members. The meeting also included reports on budget adjustments following the Town Meeting and the discovery of a nitrate issue during routine monitoring at Croft Beach, which will involve offering drinking water testing to nearby residents.

The committee discussed the PRIMEX PRIME program status including building inspections, mandatory trainings, and cyber security requirements. Other topics included the policy for document shredding and asset disposal, and plans for winter snow removal at town facilities. Department reports covered maintenance at the police station, fire department repairs and sprinkler work, heating and equipment status at the highway department, facility updates at the transfer station and sewer plant, and recreation area improvements. Additionally, the committee reviewed recent employee injury reports and addressed concerns regarding potential traffic congestion.

The committee discussed updates on past public sessions and plans for future community outreach. Topics included potential mailing inserts to improve communication with sewer users, the clarification of responsibility regarding connections between laterals and the main pipe, and recent challenges with the collection system. The committee evaluated candidates for engineering services based on RFQ interviews and formally recommended hiring Hoyle Tanner for upcoming facility projects. Financial matters were addressed, including the review of monthly reports and the proposal for the upcoming budget, which involves an increase to account for necessary staffing levels and maintenance requirements. Additionally, the committee initiated the creation of a new sewer connection application and prepared for upcoming warrant articles.

The meeting included a public hearing concerning proposed amendments to the Newbury Zoning Ordinance. Amendment No. 1 proposes updates across several articles to comply with State of New Hampshire regulations regarding Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations. Amendment No. 2 proposes language for Mixed Use under Article 4, requiring a Site Plan application. The Board also conducted a Conceptual Site Plan Review for Case 2026-001, involving six detached cabin units on Route 103B, discussing topics such as unit classification, wetland compliance, well location, density, parking, and stormwater management, concluding it likely requires a major site plan review. For Case 2026-002, the Board consulted on the requirements for obtaining a building permit on Crest Drive, specifically regarding a Liability Form related to the unapproved status of the road, advising the applicant to first approach the Fire and Highway Departments before reapplying to the Selectboard. Other business included notification that a proposed project by Toscana would not move forward and reminders regarding board member reelections.

The Board addressed continued and new cases regarding property located at 16 Edgemont Landing. Key discussions centered on requests for variances related to alterations/expansions of a non-conforming building and expansion into the 15 ft. setback. Discussions involved technical details concerning rooflines, guttering, and the implementation of pervious pavers for managing rainwater runoff, including an agreement to add at least two dry wells as a condition. Following public input, the Board voted to grant both variances with three specific conditions attached: installation of dry wells for guttering outlets, revision of plans to show proper side setback dimensions, and updating the revision date on the drawings. The final vote was five in favor to grant the variances.