Madison County

The resolutions include approving AllSeal Sealcoating LLC for the Emergency Management Agency's parking lot paving project, approving payments of invoices for the Madison County Auditor, designating Madison County as the lead entity for the Building Demolition and Site Revitalization Program, approving participation in national opioid settlements, approving the purchase of a maintenance department truck, approving the Madison County Investment Policy, approving an appropriation adjustment for Veteran Services, authorizing a budget adjustment within the Common Pleas Court, approving an amendment to the Agricultural Easement Purchase Program Cooperative Agreement, and approving a letter regarding the Multi-System Youth Agreement. Additional resolutions cover approving invoice payments for the Auditor, stating no hearing is needed on a liquor permit application for The Docks Lakeside Pizza, approving a notice to proceed for the DD Playground Project, accepting annexation petitions from Darby Township to Plain City, increasing appropriations to the Commissioner Supplies Expense Line, awarding the bid for the 2025 Madison County Paving Project to Fillmore Construction LLC, re-appointing a member to the Rural Planning Commission, approving budget adjustments for the Auditor's Office, increasing appropriations to the Auditor's Health Insurance Expense Line, approving a travel request for Board of Elections staff, authorizing the fee schedule for dog tags for 2026, and approving a zoning change. Further resolutions address accepting the resignation of Robert Higgins from the Rural Zoning Commission, awarding a bid for bridge replacement to The Ohio Bridge Corporation, approving fund transfers and budget revisions for the Family Council, approving a budget line adjustment for the Airport Authority, authorizing attendance at a budgeting conference, approving fund transfers for the Somerford Sewer Project Grant, approving employee medical insurance plans for 2026, approving annexations from Jefferson Township to West Jefferson and from Darby Township to Plain City, approving support for Fayette Madison Transport, approving increases in appropriations for county audit fees and the Courthouse Health Insurance Expense Line, adopting the updated Personnel Policy Manual, adopting the 2025 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Update, electing a property valuation method for CORSA Coverage, approving the Courthouse Men's Room Bathroom Door Project, approving an increase in appropriations for the DARE Program, approving a change order for the 2025 Madison County Paving Project, approving a travel request for the Emergency Management Agency Director, assigning authority to the Director of Job and Family Services for approving intercounty adjustments of allocated funds, and adopting a Cyber Security Policy.

The resolutions include approving payment of invoices for the Madison County Auditor, travel costs for Rob Slane to attend a conference, change orders for construction projects, appointments to the Madison County Board of Developmental Disabilities, funding to LifeCare Alliance for the Meals-on-Wheels Program, preliminary assessments for the Glade Run Lateral No. 5 Extension, a fund adjustment for the Sheriff's Office, payment of prior-year bank fees, increasing appropriations to the Municipal Court Interpreters/Witness Line, amending a resolution to designate the Madison County Land Bank as the lead entity for a program, approving an amendment to a lease agreement, approving lease agreements, approving a contract for services with the Humane Society, approving the replacement of a fire suppression compressor, approving the installation of commercial dehumidifiers, approving elevator repairs, approving budget adjustments for various departments, approving a subgrant agreement, approving adjustments to the 911 Salary Line and the Rural Zoning Budget, approving changes to the Gas Tax Budget, and approving adjustments to increase salary and health insurance expense lines.

The meeting primarily focused on discussing the London NCA and residential Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Discussions revolved around the potential development of 21 acres of MTB land within the city of London, which has been used as a farm since the 1980s. The development aims to grow the city and requires significant infrastructure investment, including roads and bridges, estimated at $12 million. The plan includes extending Eagleton to connect to 142. The property currently generates $33,000 in property taxes, with $6,500 going to the county. The development is expected to boost sales tax revenue for the county and address the negative growth rate in London. The Butcher Block was mentioned as an example of a successful development, generating significant sales tax and local wages. The project includes single-family homes, commercial spaces, and industrial areas, but excludes multi-family housing due to concerns about funding for schools. There is a vision to create a community with green spaces and amenities like stables and walking paths. The development aims to attract businesses like Kroger and Starbucks and improve the overall quality of the community.

The discussion focused on streamlining the development plan approval process to reduce wait times. Key points included the rezoning process, the roles and responsibilities of various boards, and the importance of preliminary plans. The board explored ways to improve coordination between different departments and ensure that all necessary paperwork is completed efficiently. They also addressed the need for better training for board members and the importance of adhering to rules and regulations.

The meeting addressed the procurement policy, emphasizing compliance with state, county, and federal standards, and cautioning against early involvement in rezoning applications to maintain neutrality. Discussions also covered the 911 legislation, which involves increasing the state user fee, and updates on the Corso loss control incentive program, detailing its benefits and requirements. Bids for hot mix asphalt and liquid asphalt emulsions were reviewed, including a recommendation to award chip seal emulsions to a specific vendor due to quantity considerations and bridge projects were discussed, including the recommendation to reject bids for one bridge due to high costs and explore cost reduction options.