Discover opportunities months before the RFP drops
Learn more →Key metrics and characteristics
The city where this buyer is located.
The county where this buyer is located.
Physical address of this buyer.
Contact phone number for this buyer.
Postal code for this buyer's location.
How likely this buyer is to spend on new technology based on operating budget trends.
How likely this buyer is to adopt new AI technologies.
How often this buyer champions startups and early adoption.
Includes fiscal year calendars, procurement complexity scores, and strategic insights.
Active opportunities open for bidding
California Coastal Commission
The Central Federal Lands Highway Division (CFLHD), Federal Highway Administration, issued a Special Notice announcing its intent to award a sole-source contract to the California Coastal Commission for habitat mitigation credits for impacts from the CA FLAP SCR T5(1) Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail project. The mitigation is required under USACE Nationwide Permit 14 (Section 404), California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section 401), and by USFWS, the California Coastal Commission, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife; the notice lists six sensitive habitat types and impacted acreages. CFLHD requests written responses (email) demonstrating whether competition would be advantageous and provides a response deadline and contact information for the contracting office.
Posted Date
Jul 8, 2026
Due Date
Jul 22, 2026
Release: Jul 8, 2026
California Coastal Commission
Close: Jul 22, 2026
The Central Federal Lands Highway Division (CFLHD), Federal Highway Administration, issued a Special Notice announcing its intent to award a sole-source contract to the California Coastal Commission for habitat mitigation credits for impacts from the CA FLAP SCR T5(1) Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail project. The mitigation is required under USACE Nationwide Permit 14 (Section 404), California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section 401), and by USFWS, the California Coastal Commission, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife; the notice lists six sensitive habitat types and impacted acreages. CFLHD requests written responses (email) demonstrating whether competition would be advantageous and provides a response deadline and contact information for the contracting office.
AvailableCalifornia Coastal Commission
The Department of General Services, on behalf of the California Coastal Commission, is seeking approximately 10,416 net usable square feet of office space in Long Beach. The required space must include three exclusive and twenty non-exclusive parking spaces and comply with ADA, seismic, and Title 24 standards. Preference will be given to buildings with LEED or Energy Star certifications that are located near public transit.
Posted Date
Apr 30, 2026
Due Date
May 14, 2026
Release: Apr 30, 2026
California Coastal Commission
Close: May 14, 2026
The Department of General Services, on behalf of the California Coastal Commission, is seeking approximately 10,416 net usable square feet of office space in Long Beach. The required space must include three exclusive and twenty non-exclusive parking spaces and comply with ADA, seismic, and Title 24 standards. Preference will be given to buildings with LEED or Energy Star certifications that are located near public transit.
California Coastal Commission
Provide (1) gavel-to-gavel audiovisual support for hybrid meetings (with both in person and virtual components over zoom webinar) and virtual meetings (if needed), and live internet webstreaming (webcasting) services.
Posted Date
Dec 11, 2025
Due Date
Jan 6, 2026
Release: Dec 11, 2025
California Coastal Commission
Close: Jan 6, 2026
Provide (1) gavel-to-gavel audiovisual support for hybrid meetings (with both in person and virtual components over zoom webinar) and virtual meetings (if needed), and live internet webstreaming (webcasting) services.
Get alerted before the bid drops, know which RFPs to pursue, and generate compliant drafts with AI.
Board meetings and strategic plans from California Coastal Commission
This document outlines amendments to the Ventura County Coastal Area Plan, primarily focusing on coastal hazards, sea level rise, and climate change adaptation. Key areas addressed include minimizing risks to life and property from various hazards such as erosion, flooding, and seismic events, and enhancing community, infrastructure, and ecosystem resilience. The plan integrates new policies and programs for natural adaptation, protection of coastal resources like beaches and habitats, and includes updates to the Coastal Trail to account for sea level rise impacts. Targeted outcomes include safeguarding development, ensuring structural integrity, minimizing adverse impacts on coastal resources, and promoting equitable civic engagement in planning.
This document details a proposed amendment to the City of Malibu's certified Local Coastal Program (LCP), specifically concerning changes to the Land Use Plan (LUP) and Local Implementation Plan (LIP). The amendment seeks to redesignate two beachfront parcels from Community Commercial (CC) to Commercial Visitor Serving (CV-1). The core purpose is to prioritize and reinforce visitor-serving commercial uses, such as motels and bed and breakfast inns, aligning with the policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and the certified LUP, which advocate for enhanced public opportunities for coastal recreation.
The session included roll call confirmation of attendance and a review of virtual meeting procedures. The Chief Counsel reported on closed session actions concerning litigation advice and actions in cases involving Friends of Oceaniano Dunes, Inc., Bair Bay Club, City of Fort Bragg, and Space Exploration Technologies Corporation. Agenda changes were announced, moving several items to consent, including LCP amendments for the City of San Buenaventura, County of Santa Barbara, and City of Long Beach, as well as the Lipman CDP application. Public comments focused heavily on two primary issues: the need for increased ranger presence and protection protocols for sea lions, particularly pups, at La Hoya Cove ahead of pupping season, and concerns regarding the Port of San Diego's management of public access, specifically citing the restricted access to a rooftop terrace at the Intercontinental hotel. A speaker also raised concerns about proposed and existing artificial turf installations within the Coastal Commission permit zone, urging the Commission to establish a strong policy against them.
The meeting commenced with the introduction of two new alternate participants, Commissioners Kelnik and Moreno. A significant portion of the meeting involved updates on agenda changes, including moving multiple Local Coastal Program (LCP) amendments from the City of Fort Bragg and Delnor County to the consent calendar, and postponing agenda item 15A concerning the City of Pacifica's LCP amendment regarding short-term rentals. Additionally, item 16A regarding ecological and fire resilience work in the Santa Cruz Mountains was postponed, and item 18A for the St. Louis Abyspo County LCP amendment for mineral resources was moved to consent. Public comments focused heavily on the postponed City of Pacifica short-term rental ordinance, with speakers detailing negative impacts on housing and neighborhood character, and urging the Commission to re-agendize it for April. Other public testimony addressed concerns regarding a draft protected tree ordinance for San Mateo County, emphasizing the need for restrictions during bird nesting/monarch overwintering seasons, and advocacy against development on a verified monarch overwintering site in El Granada. Furthermore, a representative requested the Commission issue a notice of violation regarding heavy metal deposition in an area following a fire, citing scientific reports of high contamination levels.
The meeting commenced with roll call and a review of virtual hearing procedures. Agenda changes included postponements for items related to Newport Beach LCP amendment, Raina appeal, and applications from San Clemente and Dana Point, while several items for Oceanside, Carlsbad, and San Diego were moved to consent. Public comments addressed opposition to a proposed development at 501 Sandpoint Road due to concerns about coastal flooding and erosion, urging the commission to consider recent King Tide effects. Other testimony raised serious concerns about a federal maritime surveillance tower installation in San Clemente, arguing it could create a climate of monitoring that deters equitable beach access. Additionally, speakers highlighted issues in Newport Harbor concerning the conversion of mooring permits to city-owned licenses without Coastal Development Permits (CDP), citing potential exclusion of working-class boaters through rate increases and permit confiscation. There was also an urgent request for enforcement action regarding the protection of the critically endangered Pacific pocket mouse on the Dana Point headlands.
Extracted from official board minutes, strategic plans, and video transcripts.
Track California Coastal Commission's board meetings, strategic plans, and budget discussions. Identify opportunities 6-12 months before competitors see the RFP.
Keep your public sector contacts fresh and actionable. No more stale data.
Premium
Win more deals with deep buyer insights
Premium
Access the largest public sector contact database
© 2026 Starbridge