Board meetings, strategic plans, and buyer signals from Massiel Medina Ferrara’s organization
Aug 19, 2026·BoardMeeting
Board
City of Trenton Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes
The Commission addressed several property applications, approving projects involving sign changes, facade repairs, and window replacements at multiple addresses including 250 Tyler Street, 222 East Hanover Street, 30 Richey Place, 238 Hamilton Avenue, 200 Hamilton Avenue, and 215 Clay Street. An application for 103 Pullen Alley was withdrawn, and another for 273 Tyler Street was adjourned due to the applicant's absence. The Commission also reviewed city announcements concerning master plan updates and discussed staffing changes.
Enterprise
Get verified public-sector contacts at scale
Find verified emails, direct dials, role context, job-change updates, and organization signals across every public-sector account you sell to.
The City Council approved a resolution amending a previous grant authorization to increase the award amount from $1.2 million to $1,488,039.06. This additional funding is designated for the procurement of two electric sanitation trucks, two electric vehicle charging stations, and the associated installation costs for the city, with no required financial match.
Dec 16, 2021·BoardMeeting
Board
City Council Of The City Of Trenton Resolution
The City Council adopted a resolution to reject seven sealed proposals received for design, bidding, and construction phase engineering services for the installation of storage tanks at 942 Prospect Street. The council determined that a substantial revision to the scope of services is required, necessitating the rejection of current proposals and a plan to re-advertise the procurement process at a later date.
Apr 15, 2025·BoardMeeting
Board
City Council Of The City Of Trenton Resolution
The City Council adopted a resolution to reject the sole proposal received from the Aloia Law Firm, LLC for legal services regarding foreclosures for the Department of Housing and Economic Development. The rejection was based on the fact that the proposed hourly rate exceeded the contracting unit's appropriation and the proposal date was stale.
Extracted from official board minutes, strategic plans, and video transcripts.
