County Evaluation Committee Reconvened Evaluation Committee Meeting
The committee met to review the scoring for the Miscellaneous Architectural Engineering (AE) services request for proposal. The primary focus was on verifying evaluation scores for nine vendors, discussing potential adjustments, and resolving tie-breakers between firms based on past performance, volume of work, and fiscal data. The committee ultimately confirmed the rankings and passed a motion to move forward with the top seven ranked firms.
Jun 11, 2026·Board meeting
Enterprise
Get verified public-sector contacts at scale
Find verified emails, direct dials, role context, job-change updates, and organization signals across every public-sector account you sell to.
The committee convened to evaluate, discuss, and score proposals submitted for the Miscellaneous Architectural Engineering (AE) Services project. The evaluation process focused on four distinct criteria: personnel qualifications, experience with similar projects, ability to meet schedule and budget requirements, and current workload capacity. The committee reached consensus scores for the proposing firms, including ASD Sky, Baker Barrios Architects, and Kier's Engineering and Design.
May 12, 2026·Board meeting
Bid Review Committee Bid Review Committee Meeting
The committee convened to review bids for the Harney Road over Harney Canal bridge repair and rehabilitation project. Discussion centered on the lowest bid submitted by M&J Construction Company, which exceeded the engineering estimate by approximately 19.3%. The committee reviewed the project's scope, including pile jacket replacement and joint system work, and evaluated the economic factors contributing to the higher bid costs. Ultimately, the committee recommended awarding the contract to M&J Construction Company due to their positive references and the critical nature of the necessary safety repairs.
Apr 30, 2026·Board meeting
Evaluation Committee Evaluation Committee Meeting
The committee met to discuss, evaluate, and score proposals for the Town N' Country Regional Drainage Improvements project. The evaluation criteria included the ability of the firm and professional personnel, experience with projects of similar size and type, willingness and ability to meet schedule and budget requirements, and current and projected workload. The committee reached consensus scores for firms including Atkins Realis and Burgess and Nipel based on these criteria.
