Board meetings, strategic plans, and buyer signals from Jason Smith’s organization
Sep 30, 2026·BoardMeeting
Board
Monterey County Planning Commission Planning Commission Meeting
The meeting included public commentary regarding a requested limitation on THC content for cannabis products. Administrative business involved correcting agenda date errors for several items and the formal continuation of a wireless facility project application to permit additional visual review by the land use advisory committee. Furthermore, staff delivered a presentation on a draft ordinance for cannabis consumption venues, covering the current regulatory landscape for retail cannabis facilities and the enforcement procedures managed by the county.
Enterprise
Get verified public-sector contacts at scale
Find verified emails, direct dials, role context, job-change updates, and organization signals across every public-sector account you sell to.
Monterey County Board of Supervisors Special Meeting
The board convened a special meeting to address a closed session item. During the proceeding, members discussed the schedule for an upcoming public meeting and subsequently recessed into the closed session.
Sep 24, 2026·BoardMeeting
Board
County Of Monterey Zoning Administrator Meeting
The meetings involved public hearings on multiple Commercial Vacation Rental applications. Key actions included the approval of several vacation rental permits, the denial of an after-the-fact vacation rental permit, and the continuance of a hearing for another rental application. The administrator also approved a hydrological restoration project for the Elkhorn Slough Foundation, a subdivision pattern book for the Rancho Cañada Village project, and addressed various property code compliance matters.
Sep 22, 2026·BoardMeeting
Board
Board of Supervisors of Monterey County Meeting
The Board of Supervisors meeting focused primarily on public opposition to the potential renewal or expansion of contracts for Flock ALPR (Automated License Plate Recognition) camera surveillance technologies. Residents and community members expressed strong concerns regarding the impact of this technology on community trust, privacy rights, potential data misuse, and the risk of collaboration with federal immigration enforcement agencies. Speakers argued that the county should prioritize community-based resources over surveillance infrastructure and expressed significant dissatisfaction with the conduct of law enforcement officials regarding the matter.
Extracted from official board minutes, strategic plans, and video transcripts.
