Email & contact info
Commissioner at Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct
Employing Organization
Team
Decision makers at Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct
Case Manager
Commissioner
Commissioner
Commissioner
Key decision makers in the same organization
Organization Signals
Board meetings, strategic plans, and buyer signals from Erik D Price’s organization
The meeting focused on the selection process for an Executive Director. Following an executive session to review candidate qualifications, the Commission performed a public vote. Members reached a consensus to advance the top two candidates to the next phase of interviews and authorized staff to provide these candidates with additional details regarding specific job duties and expectations.
Find verified emails, direct dials, role context, job-change updates, and organization signals across every public-sector account you sell to.
Verified emails & phones
Accuracy-guaranteed data
Job-change & title updates
Never lose a contact
The commission discussed the process for selecting a new executive director, including a review of the candidate pool and the screening process. Key discussion points included the legal requirements for screening applicants, the use of a scoring rubric for evaluations, and the timeline for final interviews and hiring. Members also debated the inclusion of specific qualifications, such as familiarity with the Washington state court system, and considered how to effectively assess a candidate's understanding of diversity, inclusion, and historical inequities within the judicial system.
The fact-finding hearing focused on the conduct of a judge. The session included discussions on the order of witnesses and the admission of an audio recording as an impeachment exhibit. The panel evaluated the appropriateness of the judge's tone and conduct in the courtroom and heard testimony regarding the judge's interaction with participants in the therapeutic court, as well as observations of the workplace environment, staff interactions, and operational challenges within the municipal court.
The fact-finding hearing focused on preliminary matters regarding the sealing and redaction of several submissions, including declarations and medical records. The presiding officer applied a legal balancing test to determine which portions of the documents would be sealed and which would be redacted for public access. Additionally, the parties discussed the status of a pending stipulation intended to narrow the issues and streamline the presentation of evidence for the remainder of the proceedings.
Extracted from official board minutes, strategic plans, and video transcripts.
Organization signals
Board meetings and buying signals
Salesforce & HubSpot sync
Native two-way integration
