Public documents that mention Christopher M. Talbot.
Apr 20, 2026·Board meeting
Southampton Village Planning Board Planning Board Meeting
The meeting included a public hearing regarding a site plan application for the redevelopment of properties on Job's Lane in Southampton. Key discussion topics included project design compliance with zoning codes and the village master plan, specific building setbacks, architectural guidelines, the provision of a pedestrian walkway for public access, and adjustments made in response to engineering and compliance comments. A member of the public raised concerns regarding parking calculation methods, sanitary system requirements, and the accuracy of foundation depictions in the submitted plans.
Enterprise
Get verified public-sector contacts at scale
Find verified emails, direct dials, role context, job-change updates, and organization signals across every public-sector account you sell to.
Southampton Village Board Of Trustees Special Bot Meeting
The meeting commenced with an employee recognition award for Michael Dunkerk of the central garage for his dedicated service, especially during snowstorms in January and February. The agenda included two significant public hearings. The first concerned a local law to amend Chapter 65-3, transferring the authority to designate historic districts from the Board of Architectural Review and Historic Preservation to the Village Board of Trustees. Several residents voiced opinions, primarily opposing the expansion of the historic district and supporting the Board of Trustees retaining decision-making authority over the Board of Architectural Review. The second public hearing addressed adding Chapter 11 to the village code, proposing to amend the terms of office for the Village Mayor and Trustees from two years to four years. Public commentary generally expressed opposition to the extension to four years, favoring the two-year terms for greater accountability and responsiveness to constituents. The Chairman of the Architecture Review Board confirmed their support for transferring the decision authority to the trustees. One trustee announced their recusal from conversations and voting regarding the historic district due to owning property within the proposed expansion zone.
