Director of Information Technology at Fluvanna County
Employing Organization
Team
Decision makers at Fluvanna County
Administrative Services Manager
Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney
Assistant County Administrator
Building Official
Chair, Board of Supervisors (Rivanna District)
Key decision makers in the same organization
Organization Signals
Board meetings, strategic plans, and buyer signals from Andrew Notman’s organization
The board discussed and took action on a deferral request for BZA 26:12, which involved multiple variance requests concerning minimum frontage, minimum lot width at setback, and minimum front setback requirements for the parcel identified as Tax Map 16, Section 20, Parcel 27. The board voted to defer this matter until the subsequent month's meeting.
Find verified emails, direct dials, role context, job-change updates, and organization signals across every public-sector account you sell to.
Verified emails & phones
Accuracy-guaranteed data
Job-change & title updates
Never lose a contact
The board meeting included the adoption of the agenda and the passage of a resolution recognizing Emma Monfalone for achieving the rank of Eagle Scout. The county administrator's report provided updates on a successful back-to-school backpack program coordinated by social services and honored Keith Smith with an achievement award for his regional planning contributions. Public commentary heavily featured opposition to the potential development of data centers and industrial energy corridors, citing concerns over infrastructure demands and impact on rural character. Additionally, residents advocated for the board to prioritize accessibility and inclusion beyond minimum ADA compliance for disabled citizens.
The board discussed a request for multiple zoning variances regarding frontage, lot width, and front setback for a property in the A1 agricultural general zone. The request, designated as BCA 2612 Hinsley, aimed to facilitate a family subdivision of the parcel. Key discussion points included the historical non-conforming status of the lot resulting from previous zoning ordinance updates, the inaccuracy of current GIS mapping for the property, and the specific criteria required for the board to grant the variances. Additionally, the board noted the Planning Commission's previous decision to take no action on the request and clarified that the current proceedings were focused on zoning variances rather than the subdivision process itself.
The Planning Commission held a work session to discuss the development of entrance corridor overlay districts for the county zoning ordinance. The primary goal is to protect the visual character of key corridors against development impacts. Discussion included the need for stricter buffer regulations, landscaping standards, and building setbacks compared to current ordinances. Members debated how to balance property rights, timber land management, and the visual screening of industrial or commercial uses adjacent to residential areas. The commission also reviewed previous administrative approvals and considered increasing setback requirements to 300 feet to preserve the scenic quality of the area for tourism.
Extracted from official board minutes, strategic plans, and video transcripts.
Organization signals
Board meetings and buying signals
Salesforce & HubSpot sync
Native two-way integration
