Town of Saratoga

The primary discussion topic for the meeting was the preparation and review of the 2016 budget.

The meeting included a revision and discussion concerning the nonmetallic mining ordinance, resulting in several sections and definitions being moved to or deleted from the zoning ordinance to avoid conflict or redundancy. Specific sections discussed for revision included failure to operate, reimbursement of fees, review processes, general standards, permit renewal, and damage to private wells. A concern was raised regarding the lack of recognition of tourism value by local entities, citing a potential proactive approach using a Stewardship Program application. A procedural matter regarding zoning issues for storage units and the permitting status of a new sign on Highway 13 were also discussed.

The primary activity during the meeting involved entering and exiting a closed session to deliberate or negotiate contract matters, pursuant to Wis. §19.85(1)(e). Following the closed session, the Board adjourned the meeting.

The meeting included a review of attorney Paul Kent's comments concerning the draft Nonmetallic Mining Ordinance. It was agreed that the draft ordinance should be revised as a section of the Town Zoning Ordinance to allow for more control over mining activities through zoning regulations. There was also a discussion about revising the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance, focusing primarily on the commercial district. Additionally, a concern was raised regarding the denial of a zoning change request for Jason O'Keefe, who sought to expand a business into a residential zone.

The Board met with the Town's attorney to discuss proposed changes to the Nuisance Ordinance and Court procedures, focusing on requiring property clean-up rather than just fine payment. Suggested changes included increasing citation fines, encouraging higher forfeiture fines if cases go to trial, requiring clean-up plans for uncontested citations, and increasing default fines for non-appearances. The Board also reviewed the ongoing case against Dean Folts, noting an upcoming trial date. Discussions included asking the attorney to request Scott Brehm potentially serve as a receiver if the property is declared a public nuisance, and seeking an order allowing the Town to sell assets to recoup receiver costs.