Michelle Madera

The committee convened to move into an executive session for the purpose of hearing Level III grievances as part of collective bargaining, as an open meeting could potentially harm bargaining and litigation strategy positions. Following the executive session, the committee reconvened in an open session to ratify and confirm the vote taken during the closed session.

The meeting was held to present the Superintendent's proposed FY25 budget. Key components of the presentation included an overview of projected revenues, with a significant reliance on property taxes, and expenditures, which are largely driven by salaries, benefits, and a longer school day. The committee discussed various budget investments, including initiatives for third-grade reading proficiency, student success planning, support for students with special needs, and family and community engagement. Following the presentation, members engaged in a discussion regarding resource allocation, systemic support for underperforming schools, and operational and capital improvement priorities for the upcoming fiscal year.

The meeting was convened to entertain a motion to enter into executive session for the purpose of discussing strategy for collective bargaining regarding CEA Units A, B, C, D, and E. The Committee determined that holding this discussion in an open meeting could have a detrimental effect on its bargaining position.

The committee convened to deliberate on strategy for contract negotiations with non-union personnel, specifically the Superintendent. It was determined that conducting this discussion in an open meeting would negatively impact the bargaining and negotiating position of the committee, leading to a vote to move into executive session and subsequently adjourn.

The meeting focused on the superintendent search process, including discussions on hiring an interim versus a permanent superintendent, timelines for a search, and the challenges of the current hiring landscape. Presentations covered search methods, the use of search firms, and diversity initiatives. Formal actions included the appointment of an official superintendent search liaison and the approval of a motion to convene an ad-hoc sub-committee to advise on the search process.