James E. Holmes

The board discussed and approved the 2013 Fire Protection Contracts and the 2013 Final Annual Town of Cicero Budget. Key actions included authorizing drainage improvement work at Bantry Lane, approving various purchases for the Parks and Recreation and Highway departments, and making staff appointments for the Canteen and Justice office. The board also addressed the status of a deferred compensation plan, accepted an environmental monitoring proposal for the landfill, discussed concerns regarding sustainable development resolutions, and evaluated potential repair needs for the Vollmer Creek bridge. Public input addressed budget transparency, sales tax distribution, and pending litigation involving property code violations.

The board discussed a request for an area variance to allow the construction of a storage building. Discussions covered the proposed location, the potential impact on existing property features such as fences and drainage easements, and the requirement for county planning board input. The board also reviewed deck modifications, addressed code enforcement questions regarding accessory structures, and noted a new appointment for an AdHoc board member. The case was deferred until the next meeting to allow for further review from the Onondaga County Planning Board.

The Board reviewed a proposal for a dumpster pod repair facility by Riccelli Trucking Inc., including discussions on parking, site access, and potential environmental considerations. A revised site plan for Arrow Auto Glass regarding auto glass repair and replacement was approved, specifically addressing canopy removal and signage specifications. The Board also reviewed a proposal for a new First Niagara bank branch, focusing on site layout, drive-through lanes, and the integration of sidewalks. Additionally, there was a discussion regarding a proposed sidewalk ordinance.

The board addressed several variance requests. A proposal for a non-residential structure in an agricultural zone was denied due to concerns regarding the character of the neighborhood and the potential for future use. A request for an area variance for a shed was approved with conditions requiring the shed to be moved to maintain distance from the primary residence. A request for a garage addition was denied based on its proximity to the street line, which conflicted with the character of surrounding properties. Finally, a request for a pole barn in an agricultural zone was reviewed with considerations regarding its intended use and location.

The board discussed a sign variance application for Unlimited Fam Enterprises, Inc. to allow for a total sign area exceeding the standard code allowance due to property rebranding. The application involved replacing existing wall-mounted signage at the rear and front of the building. The board reviewed five factors for the variance request, acknowledging the sign area was substantial, and ultimately approved the motion with a specific condition that the variance applies strictly to the wall-mounted signage.