Email & contact info

Emily Crocco

Chairperson at Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal

Work Email: Verified
Direct Phone: Verified
Organization: Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal · ON

Employing Organization

Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal

Organization Signals

Public Activity & Signals

Board meetings, strategic plans, and buyer signals from Emily Crocco’s organization

Jan 27, 2026BoardMeeting

Board

Commission De Révision Agricole Du Canada Procès-Verbal

The committee meeting addressed the revision of the committee mandate, specifically concerning committee composition and the transfer of chairmanship responsibilities. New members were introduced to the committee. Updates were provided regarding the maintenance of case management conferences, modifications to review request forms, and a comprehensive review of the Commission Rules by the Department of Justice. The chair presented an overview of current workload and performance, noting a significant increase in caseload over five years and the need for additional resources. Discussions were held on system-wide changes, the procedural efficiency of case management conferences, and the development of a new policy regarding the use of artificial intelligence in proceedings.

Jan 27, 2026BoardMeeting

Board

Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal Stakeholders' Advisory Committee Minutes

The committee meeting addressed several operational and procedural updates, including the approval of revised Terms of Reference. Discussions covered the introduction of new members, updates on the Tribunal's Rules, and the ongoing development of a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement. Operational performance and caseload statistics were reviewed, highlighting a significant workload increase over the past five years. The committee also engaged in a roundtable discussion regarding potential system-level changes and procedural efficiency through Case Management Conference Calls. Finally, the Tribunal announced the development of a new policy regarding the use of artificial intelligence by parties and adjudicators.

Sep 23, 2025BoardMeeting

Board

Commission De Révision Agricole Du Canada Procès-Verbal

The meeting covered several key updates from the Commission's President. The agricultural commission pilot project on admissibility has concluded, and a client satisfaction survey has been launched for parties following hearing processes. Significant progress was reported on the update of the Commission's Rules, involving subcommittee reviews and collaboration with the Treasury Board and the Department of Justice, which is expected to take six to twelve months to finalize the regulatory impact assessment summary. The Commission noted a considerable increase in the case load over the past year. Members were invited to submit historical agricultural photos for the next annual report. Discussions were held regarding Management of Instance Conferences (CGI) and a proposed Navigator project, with members largely supporting the utility of CGIs for clarifying issues and the potential benefit of the Navigator project for unrepresented applicants. Feedback was also sought on proposed changes to the Request for Review Form, specifically concerning the mandatory inclusion of grounds for review, balancing the need for advance information with the burden of proof resting on the respondent. A query regarding the increase in appeals related to animal welfare was addressed by referring to data available in the annual report and public decisions.

Sep 23, 2025BoardMeeting

Board

Canada Agricultural Review Tribunal Advisory Committee Minutes

Key discussions during the meeting included updates from the Chairperson regarding the conclusion of the Admissibility Pilot Project and the commencement of distributing the Client Satisfaction Survey upon hearing completion. Updates were also provided on ongoing revisions to CART's rules, involving Treasury Board and the Department of Justice, which necessitates drafting a Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement. A significant increase in CART's caseload was highlighted. The Committee discussed the potential implementation of a pilot "Navigator" project as an alternative to Case Management Conference Calls (CMCCs), with members noting the value of CMCCs for issue narrowing and consistency, and expressing support for the Navigator project as a resource, particularly for unrepresented applicants. Feedback was also sought on proposed changes to the Request for Review form, focusing on whether stating the reasons for review should be mandatory.

Extracted from official board minutes, strategic plans, and video transcripts.

Enterprise

Get verified public-sector contacts at scale

Find verified emails, direct dials, role context, job-change updates, and organization signals across every public-sector account you sell to.

Book a demo

Verified emails & phones

Accuracy-guaranteed data

Job-change & title updates

Never lose a contact