David Atnip

The committee reviewed district performance, accountability, and district improvement priorities. Participants engaged in group discussions to evaluate strategies, highlight organizational strengths, and identify key questions regarding district goals and improvement priorities.

The committee reviewed the results of a calendar survey, which received 546 responses from staff, parents, students, and community members. The discussion focused on analyzing calendar options, with Option 2 receiving the highest support for its consistent daily schedule, earlier school year end date in May, and dedicated curriculum planning time for teachers. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of predictable year-to-year schedules, protected planning time, and the inclusion of an intentional fall break. Attendees also participated in a final review process for the 2026-27 calendar to generate suggestions for improving clarity, balance, and flow.

The committee meeting focused on the renewal of the District of Innovation Plan. Key discussion topics included aligning the plan with legislative changes, addressing new requirements for teacher certification, and updating grievance procedures related to parental rights. The committee also reviewed changes to attendance policies, specifically returning to state requirements for the 90% attendance rule, and gathered feedback on language clarity and implementation considerations to ensure the plan remains compliant and operationally effective.

The committee reviewed the District Improvement Plan goals and compared highlights between two calendar options. Table groups provided feedback to improve calendar clarity, balance, and flow, which were subsequently finalized. Additionally, the committee heard reports regarding goals and addressed member questions.

The committee reviewed the District Improvement Plan goals, the District of Innovation renewal context, and the associated renewal process. Proposed updates to the teacher certification, grievance procedures, and attendance policies were also presented. Participants provided feedback and adjustments regarding these items in table groups.