Track open bid opportunities, contracts, public meetings, and key contacts for City of Hopkinsville.
Key metrics and characteristics
Census ID
Government ID for mapping buyers across datasets.
193400
Employee FTE
Full-time equivalent employees.
296
Population
Population size to gauge opportunity scale.
30,411
Procurement Hell Score
How easy their procurement process is to navigate. Lower is better.
66 / 100
Propensity to Spend
How likely this buyer is to spend on new technology based on operating budget trends.
AI Adoption Score
How likely this buyer is to adopt new AI technologies.
Startup Friendliness
How often this buyer champions startups and early adoption.
Latest Budget Year
Unlock to view
Operating Budget
Unlock to view
Includes fiscal year calendars, procurement complexity scores, and strategic insights.
Procurement guidance and navigation tips.
Procurement Hell Score
Lower scores indicate easier procurement. Created by Starbridge.
Quick Decision Flow
Sole Source
Cooperatives
Full playbooks include agency-specific workflows, thresholds, and vendor benchmarks.
Board meetings and strategic plans from City of Hopkinsville
The board discussed a case regarding an unsafe structure at 1017 Central Avenue, which has been neglected for several years, resulting in over $21,000 in accumulated liens, fines, and taxes. The board voted to uphold the violation and impose the maximum fine, an administrative fee, and ordered the demolition of the structure. Additionally, the board dismissed a citation issued to the wrong property owner and upheld violations and associated fines for several other cases involving repeat offenders, following the required procedures.
The board conducted a public hearing regarding an unsafe structure case at 413 Caramel Drive. The code enforcement officer presented evidence of significant structural deficiencies, including roof and wall damage, which led to the disconnection of gas and electrical utilities for safety reasons. The property owner testified about the ongoing challenges faced in securing contractors to perform the required repairs on the property.
The board convened to address multiple cases regarding property code violations. Key discussions centered on an unsafe structure at 201 South Elm Street, where the board reviewed evidence of exterior and interior damage, utility status, and the presence of trash and debris. The board ultimately determined that violations existed and voted to impose the maximum fine along with an administrative fee. Additionally, the board considered a request from the Code Enforcement Officer to dismiss a separate citation due to an administrative error regarding the property owner's address.
Extracted from official board minutes, strategic plans, and video transcripts.
Track City of Hopkinsville meetings, strategic plans, and budget discussions before the public bid appears.
Early signals from meeting minutes and plans
Vendor mentions and competitor tracking
Decision timeline from discussion to RFP
Public-sector contacts connected to City of Hopkinsville.
Quotable insights from buyer leadership
