Borough of Springdale

The meeting included the organizational proceedings where new members were sworn into office. A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the Town Justice's final annual report before retirement, highlighting a sharp decline in court cases and revenue, administrative issues with the traffic diversion program, and impacts of bail reform. The Board passed several resolutions recognizing and commending the retiring Town Justice, Highway Department employee, Sole Assessor, and Town Supervisor for their years of service. Furthermore, annual appointments and re-appointments were made for various Town officers, Planning Board, and Zoning Board of Appeals positions. Organizational resolutions established official newspapers, banks, mileage reimbursement rates, payment authorizations, and designated future meeting dates. Department reports covered Highway Department activities, including year-end financial metrics for snow/ice agreements and casino revenue distribution. The Board also authorized payment for claims listed on Abstract #1 and received/filed the 2025 financial statements. Updates were given on the adoption status of new Zoning and Subdivision Laws.

The Planning Board meeting addressed four separate applications for Minor Subdivisions, all of which involved public hearings initiated on dates prior to the current meeting, followed by the board's subsequent actions. The first application by Bridget Sulton for a property on Humphrey Road was opened, closed, and ultimately approved. The second application by James White regarding a property on Chappel Road, involving the split of ten acres, was also opened, closed, and approved. The third application by Jeff Schindler, also for a Minor Subdivision on Chappel Road, followed the same process and received board approval. The final item concerned a subdivision and transfer of a small parcel on Route 12 to resolve an encroachment issue discovered during the Town's purchase of the larger plot, which was approved with the condition that the affected lot be merged within 30 days of closing. The board also moved to approve the minutes from the October 14, 2025, and November 13, 2025, meetings before adjourning.

The Zoning Board of Appeals meeting addressed two primary variance applications. The first involved Penny Strong-Collins regarding a variance for a previously recorded two-lot subdivision that resulted in two substandard lots; the Board ultimately denied the variance, finding the hardship self-created and substantial. The second, more extensive public hearing concerned the 2-6 East Main Partnership's request for a variance to allow off-site parking for a proposed wedding venue, exceeding the 300-foot limit by 1812 feet. After significant discussion regarding safety, precedent, and the scope of their authority versus the Planning Board's, the Board voted to grant the area variance for remote parking, strictly conditioning its use on the approval of the Special Use Permit for the wedding venue, and resolved to defer the SEQRA lead agency role to the Planning Board.

The Town Board meeting agenda included two Public Hearings concerning Proposed Local Laws A of 2024 (Property Tax Exemption for Volunteer Firefighters/Ambulance Workers) and B of 2024 (Overriding Tax Levy Limit for 2025). Department and Liaison Reports were scheduled, followed by discussions on ongoing projects such as the Restore NY Grant and Zoning Update, and Old Business concerning the Assessor Trainee Position and Senior Exemptions. New Business involved resolutions to adopt both Local Laws A-2024 and B-2024, planning for 2025 Budget workshops and public hearings, and authorization for the Highway Superintendent to designate seasonal roads for the upcoming winter maintenance period.

The meeting convened as a continuation of a public hearing started on June 30, 2020, concerning an area variance application by Mark Curtis for a property on Spring Hill Street, tax map # 154.-1-7.2. Key discussions involved the history of the property subdivision, which was recorded in 2014 despite being purchased in 1986, and whether the lot could be considered pre-existing. The Board reviewed information from the County Clerk's Office and the applicant's attorney, focusing on whether the applicant had a self-created hardship since they own the neighboring parcel. After public commentary, the Board systematically reviewed the five variance standards for the requested variances: road frontage, total area, and lot width. The Board unanimously agreed that granting the variances for road frontage and lot width would not negatively change the neighborhood character, referencing comparable neighboring lots. The Board ultimately voted to approve the three variances collectively via Resolution 2020-5. Subsequently, the Board voted to waive the standard six-month sunset provision for the variance decision, resolving that the variance should run with the land.